Agentic AI takes actions. MCP connects the agents.
Torque orchestrates what they do, governs how they do it, and reports on every move they make.
AI agents are already taking infrastructure actions in production, unauthorized changes, improper access, actions no one can reconstruct. MCP solves connectivity. It doesn’t solve control. Torque is the control plane for everything agents do to your infrastructure, regardless of framework, model, or workflow.
MCP connects agents
to infrastructure.
Torque governs
what they do to it.
Torque is not trying to slow down AI agents. It is providing the control plane they need to operate at scale, without creating the governance, cost, and security gaps that will otherwise follow.
From natural language to governed infrastructure, in under two minutes
This video shows the AI Environment Designer in action: a developer describes an environment in plain language, the Copilot searches the Curated inventory, maps dependencies, and generates a policy-compliant blueprint, without a single line of YAML or any platform team involvement.

How it works
Four capabilities. One governed agentic layer across the full infrastructure lifecycle.
From natural language environment design to autonomous operational agents to governed external API access and multi-agent coordination.
Describe what you need. The Copilot builds a governed blueprint from the inventory you already own.
The AI Environment Designer removes the skills barrier between intent and governed infrastructure. A developer, data scientist, or product manager describes what they need in plain language. The Copilot searches the Curated inventory, identifies the right IaC modules, maps dependencies, and generates a deployable, policy-compliant blueprint. No YAML expertise required. No platform team involvement needed. The output is built from your actual governed assets, not generic templates, so it respects the infrastructure relationships Curate mapped and the policies your platform team enforced.
The Copilot does not guess at what assets exist. It reasons from a complete, validated inventory. That is the difference between a generic AI assistant and a governed infrastructure on
Any agent. Any framework. Every action governed, attributed, and audited through a single interface.
Torque exposes its full capability surface as a governed REST API and MCP server. Any MCP-compatible AI agent can discover and invoke Torque capabilities directly: provision environments, query deployment status, inspect drift state, trigger operational actions, check cost data, without custom integration work. Every request passes through the OPA policy engine before reaching infrastructure. Cost ceilings are checked. Tagging rules applied. Region restrictions enforced. Agent identity recorded. If the request is within policy, it proceeds. If not, it is rejected and logged. The governance model applies to every agentic action, from every agent, regardless of which framework, model, or workflow triggered the request.
Agent roles are distinct from user roles. The blast radius of every agent is defined at the platform level, not the agent level.
Any infrastructure platform claiming AI integration without agent-specific roles has the same fundamental problem: if an agent can do anything the service account can do, its blast radius is unbounded. Torque solves this architecturally. Agent roles are first-class governance objects in the platform, not credential workarounds. An agent scoped to cost operations can query cost data and surface recommendations but cannot provision or destroy. An agent scoped to deployment can provision within its quota but cannot modify governance policies. Each role is enforced at the platform level regardless of what the agent is instructed to do. The governance boundary is not a suggestion. It is enforced infrastructure.
This is the governance architecture that allows organizations to say yes to autonomous agents without saying yes to unlimited access. The boundaries are strict. The reasoning within them is the agent’s.
Multiple agents operating on shared infrastructure simultaneously, coordinated by a platform that sees everything they cannot.
When organizations scale from one or two specialized agents to a broader ecosystem of autonomous decision-makers, infrastructure becomes a shared resource that multiple agents act on simultaneously, each optimizing for its own objective, each unaware of the others. This is not a theoretical risk. It is a structural property of how agents work. They have private memory and no native awareness of other actors. Torque maintains authoritative state across every environment in the estate. When agent actions would produce conflicts, competing modifications, incompatible intentions, or simultaneous changes to shared resources, Torque detects the conflict, applies the organization’s defined priority hierarchy, and resolves it before infrastructure is affected. Coordination at the platform level is the only place it can reliably work.
Govern the AI infrastructure that matters most, from GPU hardware to autonomous agents
Torque governs the full NVIDIA AI stack end to end: NIM inference endpoints, NeMo fine-tuning and RL training environments, and NemoClaw autonomous agent deployments: across DGX systems, AI Pods, cloud GPU clusters, and edge hardware. Platform teams can provision the complete AI infrastructure stack as a single governed blueprint, identically every time, without individual engineers needing to understand the GPU layer. Data scientists get self-service access to the GPU environments they need. FinOps teams see real-time cost attribution across every AI workload. Platform teams govern the full stack without becoming a bottleneck.
When governments ask who controlled the AI making infrastructure decisions, Torque has the answer.
Sovereignty, as McKinsey defines it, is about who is in charge when AI makes decisions: who controls the data, the models, the infrastructure, and the decision-making. Once AI systems become agentic, sovereignty is a risk issue, not a policy debate. The EU AI Act enforcement deadline is August 2026. Gartner predicts 65% of governments will introduce technological sovereignty requirements by 2028. Sovereign cloud infrastructure spending is $80 billion this year and accelerating. An MCP server cannot prove control. It can only prove connectivity. Sovereignty requires the former. Torque provides it: every agentic action attributed to a specific agent with a specific scope, every decision logged with full context, every policy violation blocked before it reaches infrastructure.
The AI layer runs across every Torque capability. It is not a separate tool.
The AI Copilot draws from what Curate discovered, powers what Self-Service deploys, and drives what Operate monitors and remediates. Every capability is better because the AI layer has access to the full, governed picture.
The complete governed inventory the AI Copilot works from
Where the AI Environment Designer makes governed infrastructure accessible to every team
Where autonomous agents monitor, detect, and act across every environment in your estate
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Standard AI responds to prompts. It generates text, answers questions, and produces outputs for a human to review and act on. Agentic AI takes actions. It does not wait for human review between steps. It assesses a situation, determines what to do, and executes, potentially triggering further actions based on the result. That distinction is operationally significant. When an AI agent can provision infrastructure, scale compute, or terminate resources without human intervention at each step, the question of what governs those actions: who authorized them, what limits apply, who is accountable for the cost, is not theoretical. It is live, in production, right now, in most enterprise environments that have deployed AI tooling.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open standard, developed by Anthropic and adopted across the industry, that enables AI agents to discover and invoke external tools and capabilities in a structured, governed way. When Torque implements an MCP server, any MCP-compatible agent can discover Torque’s capabilities and call them directly, without custom integration work. The agent learns what Torque can do: provision environments, query state, inspect drift, check costs, and can invoke those capabilities as part of its reasoning process. Crucially, the Torque MCP server enforces the same policy controls, cost limits, and audit trail as any other request. The agent gets governed access to infrastructure capabilities. The organization gets a complete record of what the agent did and why.
User roles govern what a human can do in Torque based on their job function and team membership. Agent roles govern what an autonomous agent can do based on its defined scope and purpose. They are separate objects in the platform for a deliberate reason. If an agent inherits user-level permissions through a service account, its blast radius is the same as that user, potentially very broad. Agent roles are scoped specifically to what that agent needs to accomplish its purpose and nothing more. An agent responsible for cost operations has read access to cost data and the ability to surface recommendations. It cannot provision or destroy. An agent responsible for deployment can provision within its quota. It cannot modify cost policies. The scope is enforced by the platform, not by the agent developer, which is the only way to make it reliable.
Without a coordination layer, this produces race conditions and conflicting state. A cost agent terminates instances the deployment agent just provisioned. A remediation agent and a maintenance agent make incompatible changes to the same environment simultaneously. Each agent is behaving correctly from its own perspective. Together they produce an outcome no one intended and no one can easily explain. Torque maintains authoritative state across every environment in the estate. When agent actions would conflict, Torque detects the conflict before it reaches infrastructure, applies the organization’s configured priority hierarchy: typically compliance first, then SLA commitments, then cost optimization: and resolves the conflict by sequencing, blocking, or escalating. Agent developers do not need to solve this individually. It is handled at the platform level, which is the only place it can work reliably at scale.
The Copilot works with whatever is in the inventory, but the quality and accuracy of what it generates is directly tied to the completeness of what Curate has discovered. If the inventory includes 200 validated IaC modules, the Copilot can generate precise, accurate blueprints from those assets. If the inventory is partial, the Copilot’s output will reflect those gaps, it may suggest generic templates for the missing pieces, or flag that certain components are not available in the governed catalog. This is not a limitation, it is how the system maintains the guarantee that AI-generated infrastructure is built from assets your organization actually owns and governs. Starting with a complete Curate discovery is the highest-leverage step an organization can take before activating the AI Copilot.
Any agent that can call a REST API or an MCP endpoint can use Torque’s governed infrastructure surface. This includes LangChain, AutoGen, CrewAI, and any other framework that supports tool calling or MCP protocol. It includes coding assistants like GitHub Copilot and Cursor when they are configured to use external tools. It includes CI/CD pipeline agents in GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins. It includes any custom agent built on any model, Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, or others. The governance layer does not care about the agent’s architecture. It applies policy, records attribution, and enforces cost limits to every request, regardless of the source.
Try it yourself
Experience the AI Copilot in a live governed environment
No installation. No configuration. Connect to a pre-loaded environment with a complete Curated inventory and explore the full AI Copilot capability, from natural language blueprint generation to governed external agent access.
AI Environment Designer active with a pre-loaded Curated inventory, describe what you need and watch the Copilot generate a deployable, policy-compliant blueprint
MCP endpoint accessible in the sandbox, connect any MCP-compatible agent and see governed API calls, policy enforcement, and attribution in action
Agent role examples configured showing the difference between scoped and unscoped agent access, with the governance controls enforced in real time
Multi-agent scenario available demonstrating conflict detection and resolution when two agents attempt incompatible actions simultaneously
Ready to govern the agents already operating in your infrastructure?
See how Torque provides the governed AI layer that makes agentic infrastructure safe to scale, in a live session tailored to your environment, your agent landscape, and your governance requirements.